Most established cannabis brands and retailers are buying or exploring some aspect of programmatic advertising as a means for compliant reach to new customers online. While many agencies exist and offer this service, the type of websites or apps you purchase ad space on will directly impact your success with your ads.
Spending too much on ads and engagement becomes a negative ROI event, spend too little and you risk running into quality issues with respect to who sees your ads.
Lately – the world of MFA websites or “Made For Advertising” websites has become the topic of much conversation as to whether or not these sites should be included in programmatic ad buys.
These platforms are designed with the primary goal of hosting ads and generating revenue through clicks and impressions. However, their impact on programmatic ad campaigns, particularly for cannabis advertisers, comes with a mixed bag of advantages and challenges.
These sites often consist of low-quality content and are structured to drive user engagement toward the displayed ads. MFA websites can encompass a wide range of niches, from health and lifestyle to news and entertainment. Their content tends to be lightweight, designed primarily to lure users into clicking on ads, hence maximizing revenue for the site owner.
Below we look at the debate on the pros and cons of MFA websites in your programmatic ad campaign.
Positive Impacts on Cannabis Ad Campaigns
- Broader Reach: MFA websites usually have a substantial reach due to their focus on attracting diverse audiences. This can be advantageous for cannabis advertisers aiming to increase their brand visibility across various demographics.
- Cost Efficiency: Advertising on MFA websites can often be more cost-effective than premium placements on high-traffic platforms. This allows cannabis advertisers to stretch their advertising budget further.
- Quick Campaign Deployment: MFA websites generally have simplified approval processes and quicker campaign deployment timelines, enabling cannabis advertisers to swiftly adapt to market changes.
Negative Impacts on Cannabis Ad Campaigns
- Quality Concerns: MFA websites are notorious for hosting low-quality and often misleading content. Associating with such platforms might inadvertently impact the reputation of cannabis advertisers, potentially raising concerns among their target audience.
- Relevance and Targeting Issues: The content on MFA websites might not align with the interests of the cannabis audience, leading to inefficient targeting. Advertisers might struggle to effectively reach users who are genuinely interested in their products.
- Risk of Ad Fraud: MFA websites are sometimes vulnerable to ad fraud practices, including click fraud and impression fraud. This can drain advertising budgets and yield poor returns on investment for cannabis advertisers.
Navigating the Landscape
For cannabis advertisers considering utilizing MFA websites, a balanced approach is vital. Careful consideration should be given to the quality of the website, its audience alignment, and the associated risks. Leveraging MFA websites as part of a broader advertising strategy, rather than relying solely on them, can help mitigate potential drawbacks.
In conclusion, MFA websites offer both advantages and challenges for cannabis advertisers looking to enhance their programmatic ad campaigns. While the potential for broader reach and cost efficiency exists, advertisers must be mindful of the quality and alignment of these platforms with their brand image and legal requirements.
Striking a strategic balance between MFA websites and other advertising avenues will be the key to maximizing the impact of ad campaigns while minimizing risks.
